Vibe Coding Assistance
Move from idea to working MVP in weeks — not quarters — with weekly iterations.
Usually enters at the idea stage.
- AI Development
- MVP Development
- Rapid Prototyping
What it covers.
Engineers work beside your AI-assisted build, so the prototype you can click becomes code you can keep. Each week ends with a working build and a short list of what changes next.
AI coding tools have genuinely changed what one person can produce in a weekend. A founder can describe a product and have something running by Sunday evening, and the screens are often good — they encode real thinking about the customer. What has not changed is which decisions are expensive to get wrong, and those are still the ones nobody prompts for.
We work alongside the build rather than replacing it. You or your team keep moving at the speed the tools allow; our engineers review what is generated, fix what is quietly broken, and steer the handful of choices that are ruinous to reverse: who is allowed to see which record, how the data is shaped, where the secrets live, and what happens when a payment half-succeeds.
If you already have a prototype, we start with an audit instead. A few days, and what you get back is a plain document: what can stay as it is, what needs rework and what would go wrong if it did not, what has to be rebuilt, what each part costs, and the order to do it in. Sometimes the honest answer is that the prototype should become the specification and the code should be thrown away. We say so when it is true.
Who it’s for
- Founders building with Lovable, Bolt, Cursor, Claude Code or similar who want the speed without the rebuild.
- Teams holding a working prototype and an offer of real money, who need to know what stands between the two.
- Non-technical founders who need an engineer in the room for the decisions they cannot evaluate.
What you get.
Every engagement ends with these in your hands, in your accounts, under your ownership.
- 01
A weekly working build
Something you can open and click through every week, deployed where you can reach it, with a short note on what changed and what is next.
- 02
An audit you can act on
What stays, what is reworked, what is rebuilt — each with a cost and a reason, in the order that makes the rest cheaper.
- 03
The expensive decisions, made properly
Authorisation, the data model, secret handling and failure paths: the four things that turn a prototype into a liability if they are left as generated.
- 04
A codebase your next hire can read
Repeated logic consolidated, so a change is one edit rather than five, and the pace does not collapse in week four.
Built with
- Cursor and Claude Code
- Lovable and Bolt
- Next.js
- React
- TypeScript
- PostgreSQL and Supabase
- Code review and refactoring
- CI and automated tests
How it runs from brief to launch
Vibe Coding Assistance follows the same four steps as every discipline here, so adding another one later changes nothing about how you work with us.
- 01
Tell us the outcome
One conversation covers every discipline involved, so you explain the business once, to the people who would do the work.
- 02
Get a written plan
The plan names who does what, in what order and what each part costs, before any of the work starts.
- 03
One team delivers it
Designers, engineers and QA work from the same plan in the same channel, so handoffs happen inside the team.
- 04
We stay after launch
The people who built it keep it running, report on how it performs and keep improving it.
Work in this discipline
Projects where vibe coding assistance was one of the disciplines on the plan.
Questions we get asked
The ones that come up in the first call. Anything else, ask us directly.
What is vibe coding assistance?
You or your team build with AI coding tools; our engineers work alongside, reviewing what is generated, fixing what breaks and steering the architecture so it holds up.
We already have a prototype. Can you take it on?
Yes. We audit it first and tell you plainly what can stay, what needs rework and what it would cost to make it production-ready.
How fast is a weekly iteration?
Each week ends with a working build you can click through and a short list of what changes next. Most ideas reach a testable MVP in three to six of those.
Do we need engineers on our side?
No. A founder or product owner who can decide quickly is enough. If you do have engineers, we pair with them and hand over as we go.
Which AI coding tools do you work with?
Cursor, Claude Code, Lovable and Bolt most often, and we are tool-agnostic in practice: what we review is the code that comes out, not the thing that produced it. If your team has settled on something else, we work in that.
Is it cheaper to rescue a prototype or start again?
It depends on two things: whether the data model can be salvaged, and how much duplicated logic there is. Screens and copy are almost always worth keeping. When starting again is cheaper we say so, and we keep the prototype as the specification rather than throwing away the thinking in it.